The oboe is not a clarinet!

what is an Oboe?
A Guide For Young Oboists

The oboe is not a clarinet and so can you!!

Although many people would beg to differ, the oboe is not a clarinet. It is just not. You may have been thinking that it is, but it’s not. At times, after reading this or attempting to learn to play the oboe, you may even begin to wish the oboe was a clarinet. However, as previously stated, it is not.

 

No amount of asking to confirm this incongruity will change the fact the the oboe is a different instrument. It is simply not played by a famous cartoon squid. While they are both long, black tubes for music, some obvious differences are: the mouthpiece, the bell, and the keys.

 

The oboe has a self-contained noise production apparatus known as the reed. This marvel of engineering takes precision, creativity and vision to master, both in playing and making. It is constructed by scraping a folded piece of cane bound by some thread to a cork and metal tube. This setup is named the double reed, and it is twice as remarkable. Truly marvelous sounds can be emitted by this device, but for most of the learning process, a rooster on a firecracker would be considered an upgrade.

The bell of the oboe is rounded and compact. It receives the attention it deserves by merit alone. The oboe projects and sings through the bell with the most minimal flare, while the clarinet bell flares to an obnoxious degree. There have been many treatises written in an attempt to discover what the clarinet could be compensating for with this tactless and overly obvious attempt to imitate the trumpet, but alas, the mystery persists.  

In contrast, the clarinet has a ready-made mouthpiece into which any novice can slip a single reed and produce the characteristic damp and mellow sound.

The key-work on an oboe is intricate and elegant. Even though there is always, without exception, something malfunctioning on this mechanism, it is required for such grace and beauty, which the oboist enjoys. Developing good technique on the oboe is a lifelong challenge. Technical development is not aided in the least by the cross fingerings and near-light speed finger teleportation required of the mechanism.

The clarinet keys are rudimentary in design and so simple, in fact, that virtuoso technique can be mastered on the clarinet in the time span of a slumber party. If you can tie your shoes, you have good technique on the clarinet.

These differences in the mouthpiece, bell, and keys are fundamental distinctions among these instruments.  Additionally range of the Clarinet extends a full octave above that of the oboe which may seem to dwarf the oboe, perhaps this is why the clarinet is so much more popular than the oboe. Perhaps oboists have more refined tastes, who can be sure. There may seem to be a lot at odds between these two staple woodwind instruments,  but despite all their differences they do tend to get along.

The oboe is also not a bassoon or a saxophone…

This Post Has 12 Comments

  1. Hey Danny! Nice braid! Now I know that an oboe is not a clarinet, and I am ergo I think.

    1. You Nailed it!!!

  2. Nice article!

  3. Thank goodness there is somebody on the planet that knows that and oboe is not a clarinet, a bassoon, a french horn, or a tuba.

  4. Personally I find the information about the clarinet being able to extend a full octave above the oboe to be rather misleading. It is true that the clarinet can go higher than the oboe, but I feel people may read this information and assume that the oboe is the lower instrument of the two which isn’t the case. Clarinets can typically go a lot lower than oboes can, even if they can go a bit higher, which is due to clarinets having a wider range. Additionally the passagio and tessitura of the clarinet happen lower than on the oboe. The timbre of the clarinet is also quite dark compared to that of the oboe.

    1. Good point, thx Syde, I think the take away is that the oboe range is quite limited in comparison to other instruments. Please let me know if you have thoughts on other posts as well.

  5. Haha, as a clarinetist who just picked up the oboe I feel a bit offended to be honest … like yes, of course I get the humour and wasn’t taking this article too seriously. But I still found one thing a bit disturbing:

    “The clarinet keys are rudimentary in design and so simple, in fact, that virtuoso technique can be mastered on the clarinet in the time span of a slumber party. If you can tie your shoes, you have good technique on the clarinet.”

    This could not be further from the truth. Lol.

  6. YOU HAVE INSULTED THE BEAUTIFUL PHYSIQUE OF THE CLARINET, THEREFORE WE REJECT YOU FROM THE TITLE OF “RESPECTABLE MUSICIAN”!!!!

  7. I could not be more offended by the description of the clarinet in this article. Although it may be true that the clarinet has simpler keys, this does not make it any less appealing. Also, the statement that “if you can tie your shoes, you can have good technique on the clarinet” is flat-out wrong. No instrument is as simple as tying your shoes, although they might need to invent one for you. “The clarinet bell flares to an obnoxious degree” Have you heard of acoustics? “range of the Clarinet extends a full octave above that of the oboe […] Perhaps oboists have more refined tastes” I don’t know how the heck you believe that an extended range is a bad thing, but if you do, try percussion. After all, they’ve only got one pitch. Although, that might still be too much for you to comprehend.

  8. How do I register my utter contempt for this article?

  9. How about the writer of this article tries to play the clarinet? I think they will find that it is not nearly as easy as they think. This is deeply offensive considering that I have been playing the clarinet for the last 3 years.

  10. How about the writer of this article tries to play the clarinet? I think they will find that it is not nearly as easy as they think.

Leave a Reply

Close Menu
×
×

Cart